Conservatism

Religious Without Being Morally Serious Vs. Morally Serious Without Being Religious

By | August 23, 2005 |

The Wall Street Journal’s Best of the Web nails this story about Pat Robertson: Since we’ve defended the “religious right,” we suppose we’d better say a word about Pat Robertson’s latest foolishness, as reported by the Associated Press: Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson called on Monday for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, calling him…

Shahid�s Strawman No. 3

By Carroll Andrew Morse | August 15, 2005 |

Sunday’s Projo ran a detailed, 10-point essay accusing “the right wing” (abbreviated in the article as RW) of hypocrisy. My initial impression is that not a single one of the ten points has any serious merit to it. The Senescent Man has some thoughts on point #2. RightRI takes on point #7. Here are my…

Relinking Constitutional Law & Jurisprudence to the Constitution

By | July 3, 2005 |

William Kristol, in an article entitled Reversing the Bork Defeat, makes this observation: On October 23, 1987–a day that lives in conservative infamy–Robert Bork’s nomination to the Supreme Court was rejected by a Democratic Senate. Now, 18 years later, George W. Bush has the chance to reverse this defeat, and to begin to fulfill what…

The “Hypocrisy” of Conservative Individuals Doesn’t Negate Their Ideals

By Marc Comtois | May 13, 2005 | Comments Off on The “Hypocrisy” of Conservative Individuals Doesn’t Negate Their Ideals

Travis Rowley has an excellent piece in today’s ProJo explaining that Conservative “hypocrisy” as evidenced by the moral failures of some prominent conservatives does not render the moral ideals themselves invalid. Yet, that is what liberals are essentially implying when they cry “hypocrisy” when a conservative suffers a moral stumble. If a Sunday Preacher challenges…

Limited Government to Protect Equal Rights

By Justin Katz | March 31, 2005 |

When Mac Owens first signed on as a contributor to Anchor Rising, he sent me a speech that he had given on February 23, 2002, at the North Kingston Town Committee’s Annual Lincoln Dinner. The current collection of issues, both nationally and in Rhode Island, makes it particularly appropriate for posting now. (I’m told, by…

Moving Rhode Island to the Right

By Justin Katz | March 14, 2005 | Comments Off on Moving Rhode Island to the Right

Figures I’d find out about this at the last minute and that it’s on a day when I’m busy and under the weather, but any of you who are healthy and free might be interested to know that Dinesh D’Souza will be speaking at Brown tonight at 8:00 p.m. in the Salomon Center for Teaching…

Labels as a First Step Toward Finding Deeper Meaning

By | January 18, 2005 |

I received the December 2004 issue of The Proposition, a publication of the Claremont Institute. As a graduate of Harvey Mudd College, one of the Claremont Colleges, who also satisfied the requirements for a political science major at Claremont McKenna College, I found one of the quotes in the issue to be an interesting perspective…

Interview with Michael Medved

By | December 26, 2004 | Comments Off on Interview with Michael Medved

The January-February 2005 issue of The American Enterprise magazine contains an interview with Michael Medved, whose background is summarized at the beginning of the interview: Michael Medved was voted “most radical” in his Los Angeles high school class, then graduated from Yale and attended Yale Law School, where he knew Bill and Hillary Clinton. He…

Our Declaration of Independence

By | December 26, 2004 |

This posting relates to a previous posting on the American Founding and also relates to Liberal Fundamentalism and The Naked Public Square Revisited, Parts I, II, and III. Thanks to Power Line for referring to a 1926 speech by Calvin Coolidge on the 150th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. If you ever have any…

Independently Moderate

By Marc Comtois | December 20, 2004 |

In a story by Howard Fineman, Mitch McConnell casts the current political “divisiveness” in its proper historical context: “It’s naive to assume there would be one collection of views widely held by everyone,” he said. “I’m amazed at all this hand-wringing over the level of discourse and partisanship. It leads me to believe nobody has…

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.